|
[members]
[publications]
|
  
|
|
Prion diseases
Transmissible spongiforme encephalopathy
Prion diseases are a group of fatal neurodegenerative disorders such
as Creutzfeldt-Jabob disease (CJD), scrapie or bovine spongiforme
encepahlophathy (BSE). In contrast to other neurodegenerative disorders
like Alzheimer disease or Chorea Hungtinton they are caused not only
sporadically or genetically but also by infection
(?transmissible?). Histopathology shows spongiform degeneration and
astrocytic gliosis (figure 1). Clinical symptoms are
coordinative malfunctions (Ataxia) and dementia.
|
 |
 |
| CJD |
BSE |
 |
 |
| Scrapie |
Kuru |
|
Fig. 1: Histopathology |
|
|
Scrapie
The oldest known prion disease, was described 1759 (Leopold) and is
characterized by the abnormal walk and scratching of infected sheep and
goats. The srapie agent was adapted to mice and hamster, which are used
as model systems in basic research.
|
|
|
|
Fig. 2a: Sheep infected with scrapie |
Fig. 2b: Fore people in Papua New Guinea |
|
Human Prion Diseases
CJD is the most common form of human prion diseases and occurs with an
estimated incidence of one case per 1 million population per year. The
mean age of onset is about 60-65 years. The mean illness duration is
about 7-8 month; death occurs within 12 months of illness in 85-90 % of
cases. Usual symptoms are rapid dementia, visual abnormalities,
cerebellar dysfunctions (incoordination, gait, speech abnormalities) and
EEG tracing shows characteristic signals. However confirmation still
requires postmortem histopathology and/or PrPres detection.
About 85 % of all CJD cases are caused sporadically, no genetic or
infectious reason could be found (see also replication model). About
10-15 % are caused by mutations (genetic). The mean age of onset is
depending on the mutation slightly decreased. Besides genetic CJD
Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker (GSS) and fatal familiar insomnia (FFI)
are genetic caused prion diseases. About 20 different mutations in the
prion protein gene are associated with human prion diseases. Depending
on the mutation the symptoms and the affected area of the brain can
vary.
Less than 1 % of all CJD cases are caused by infection. Infection was
caused by massive medical treatment as neurosurgery, cornea or
dura-mater transplantations (> 60 cases) or human growth hormone (>
85 cases).
Another infectious human prion disease is called kuru or translated
laughing death. Among the Fore people in Papua New Guinea the spread of
kuru was caused by a ritual cannibalism. Besides the coordinative
malfunctions the cerebellar deficits were often associated by
uncontrollable and inapropiate episodes of laughter.
|
Bovine spongiform encephalophathy
Since 1985 prion diseases attracted economic attention by the
recognition of BSE epidemic in the UK. The offal of scrapie
infected sheep is thought to be responsible for the BSE epidemic. In the
late 70ies the process of meat and bone meal (MBM) production was
altered and the scrapie agent was not inactivated anymore. After the
feed-ban in 1988 the BSE epidemic reached its maximum in 1992 with more
than 37000 cases (figure 3). A mean incubation time
of 4-5 years and
still more than 1000 cases in 2000 in the UK suggests other, secondary
infection routes, which still have to be examined. In 2000 the first
cases of BSE occurred in Germany, the infection route is also still
unknown, but MBM seems to be unlikely.
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 3a: Cow infected with BSE |
Fig. 3b: BSE statistics |
Fig. 3c: vCJD statistics |
|
Variant CJD
In 1996 prion diseases again attracted public attention because a new
variant of CJD was reported in the UK (figure
3). The vCJD can be
distinguished from CJD by its unusual youg age at onset (mean: 28 years)
and prolonged duration (mean: 14 month). Most of the patients show
psychiatric symptoms first and no EEG characteristics are found. So far
all vCJD patients were Methionin homozygot at Codon 129 (see
Polymorphism Codon 129).
|
  
|
|
The prion concept
The causative agent was characterized by its abnormal resistance
against conventional decontamination methods. Methods which modify or
destroy nucleicacids like radiation or could not destroy the
infectivity. In contrast there to methods which modify or destroy the
structure of proteins like urea or guanidinium hydrochlorid could
destroy the infectivity. This is contradictory to the fact that
conventional viruses use nucleicacids for replication (figure 4). In
1982 Stanley B. Prusiner coined the term prion for proteinaceous
infectious particle. Highly purified prion-rods consist mainly if not
exclusively of an abnormal isoform of the prion protein. The prion
protein is a host encode protein with yet unknown function. Chemical
differences between the cellular prion protein (PrPC) and the scrapie
isoform (PrPSc) are not found. They differ in
their biochemical and
biophysical properties. is in contrast to PrPC insoluble, resistant
against proteinase K digestion and infectious. Its secondary structure
is beta-sheeted while PrPC is mainly
alpha-helical. PrPC is a monomeric,
GPI-anchored and N-glycosylated membrane protein. Figure 5 shows the NMR
structure of recombinant hamster PrP and a structure model of
PrPSc. Besides PrP only lipids and sugars
have been found in prion rods
yet. Nucleic acids could not just be found yet, but nucleic acids longer
than 80 nucleotides could also be excluded as an essential part of an
infectious unit.
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 4a: Conventional virus |
Fig. 4b: Structural model |
Fig. 4c: Replication model |
|
How can a protein replicate itself?
According to the template assisted heterodimer model (Prusiner and
Cohen, 1998) converted to PrPSc by
interaction of an metastable form
(PrP*) with PrPSc and a necessary secondary
factor so called protein X
or factor X. This was the first model which could explain all three
forms of prion disease manifestation. In case of an infection PrPSc is
added by an extra cellular incident and converts cellular The sporadic
form can be explained by a spontaneous conversion of PrPC. This is a rare event, which explains the
small number of cases and the high age at
onset, the possibility of a spontaneous conversion increases with
lifetime. Mutations in the prion protein (genetic form) also increase
the possibility of a spontaneous conversion.
|
  
|
|
The conversion from PrPC to PrPSc:
How does a normal, cellular protein become an infectious agent?
The exact mechanism of the conversion from the cellular PrPC to the
infectious form PrPSc is still unknown. The "normal", cellular isoform
of the prion protein has exactly the same aminoacid sequence as the
scrapie isoform, but it does have different characteristics:
PrPC is a monomeric protein which is soluble in so-called "soft"
detergents and is sensitive to digestion with proteinase K. In contrast,
PrPSc is insoluble, and the N-terminus (AA 90-231) is unusually
resistent to PK digestion.
|
| PrPC
| PrPSc
|
| solubility
| soluble |
non soluble |
| structure
| predominantly alpha-helical |
predominantly beta-sheeted |
multimerisation state
| monomeric |
multimeric (aggregates) |
| infectivity
| non infectious |
infectious |
Tab. 1: Properties of the cellular and the infectious form of the prion
protein.
The infectious agent of the scrapie disease is thought to consist
mainly, if not entirely, of protein: the prion-protein. In order to
prove this hypothesis, it would be necessary to simulate the conversion
from the cellular form into the infectious form in the test tube (in
vitro). So far, nobody has achieved this in vitro conversion, although
many labs are working on it.
In our group, we have developed a method for an in vitro conversion
which can induce at least some features of PrPSc from either solubilized
PrP27-30 (prion rods) or recombinant PrP of the same amino acid
sequence. This system uses the anionic detergent SDS (sodium dodecyl
sulfate) to induce a soluble, monomeric and PK sensitiv form of PrP from
either the recombinant protein or prion rods. Dilution of the SDS leads
to aggregation which is concomitant with a structural change. Those
aggregates or multimers are not significantly more infectious than the
soluble form, but they have a different structure (increased beta-sheet
content) and they are partially resistent to proteinase K.
 |
|
Fig. 5a: Conversion model.
|
The differences between the two states can be examined by biophysical
methods:
Circular dichroism measurements show the secondary structure of the
protein and allow the determination of an increased beta-sheet content. The
multimerisation can be followed by the use of fluorescence correlation
spectroscopy. This rather new technique measures the diffusion time of
molecules in solution. Because multimers move much slower in a solution
than the smaller monomers, the aggregation process can be detected.
At the moment, the in vitro conversion system using SDS is used for
different purposes:
|
diagnostics: A new and sensitive test
for BSE might be developed using FCS
|
|
other components: One reason for the failing of all attemps to
generate new infectivity from non infectious material might be
that additional factors (for example polysaccherides) must be
added to the protein.
|
|
more detailed analysis of the involved transitions
|
The exact conditions for the formation of large, highly structured
fibrils is one important direction of current research. Another is the
mechanism of the structural transition. For example, what intermediates
are there in the structural transition? Can PrP dimers be found as a
first step in the formation of larger multimers, and what do they look
like?
|
  
|
|
TSE-Diagnostics
Besides spontaneous aggregation (see "The conversion from PrPC to PrPS") also seeded
multimerization was analysed. It was found that addition of soluble PrP
into pre-existing PrP-multimers, either natural and infectious ones or
synthetic, was much faster and could be studied by FCS in a time window smaller than 30 minutes in which spontaneous
aggregation did not lead to multimers of comparable size. (Post et
al. 1998)
One hallmark of amyloid diseases like AD and TSE is the presence of
amyloid
fibrils. So the principle of the seeded aggregation was applied to the
diagnostic of Alzheimer
disease (AD) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of AD-patients
(Pitschke et al., 1998). By the incooperation of fluorescence
labeld antibodies or Aß-peptides highly labeled aggregates are
formed which have at least by a factor of 2
a higher fluorescence than the background and can be easliy detected as
fluorescence bursts. The occurence and amount of amyloid fibrils can be
determined by the amount of fluorescence bursts. This is true for either
for labeld Aß-peptides incoorporated into Aß-fibrils or
labeled PrP into prion-rods (as shown in fig. 6a).
|
|
|
|
Fig. 6a Detection of Prion-rods by
incoorporation of fluorescence labeld PrP into Prion rods with
FCS.
On the left the fluorescencefluctuations for the
monomeric probes and on the right the resulting fluorescencebursts
after the incorporation or attachment of the probes into and onto
the prion-rods are shown.
|
Fig. 6b Detection of Aß-aggregates in
CSF of AD patients and controls.
'Probe' measurements represents the background from spontaneous
mulitmerization of labeled Aß-peptides in buffer, either in
0.2% SDS or in 0.01% SDS. C.A.A. patient with cerebral amyloid
angiopathy. (source: Nat Med. 1998 Jul;4(7):832-4)
|
|
|
The basic approach for the diagnostic system based on the assumption
that extracellular deposits of Aß-aggregates, primarily existing
in the central nervous system also occur in the cerebrospinal fluid in
the case of AD. That this is true was shown succesfully in initial
experiments with 15 AD patients and 16 controls as it its shown in
fig. 6b.
|
|
For human TSEs the system is developed by the group of Prof. Kretzschmar at
the LMU in Munich (Bieschke et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000
May 9, 97(10), 5468-73). For animal TSEs it is not so
important that the Prion rods occur in the CFS of the animals. It is
much more easier to obtain brain material than by human. So we
develope this system further for a diagnostic system on animals
(specially cows).
|
  
J. Schell,
K. Jansen,
O. Schäfer
Last modified: Thu Mar 20 15:16:27 CET 2003
|